Prediction of Charles Broom vs Matic Spec Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Broom vs M. Spec

Charles Broom
GBR
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
27
Age
30
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
370
C. Rank
Ret.
235
Best Rank
710
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Matic Spec
SLO
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
27
Age
30
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
370
C. Rank
Ret.
235
Best Rank
710
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$40.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 1 Spec
They have played 4 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Matic Spec winning 2. The last match between Charles Broom and Matic Spec was at the M15 Fayetteville, 03-11-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broom | 1 |
| Spec | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Fayetteville(11-03-21)
Charles Broom
6
7
Matic Spec
1
5
(R1) USA F21 (Decatur)(08-01-18)
Matic Spec
6
6
Charles Broom
1
0
C. Broom vs M. Spec H2H Profile
C. Broom vs M. Spec Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charles Broom has won 43.13% of points on their second serve, while Matic Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charles Broom, in recent form, has won 46.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matic Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.61% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charles Broom has saved 53.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matic Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charles Broom has won 61.82% of matches played (W/L 34/21), with Matic Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charles Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 25/22). Matic Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/59).
- Player level: In the last year, Charles Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 79.41% of matches (W/L 27/7), where as Matic Spec has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Charles Broom winning 1 times and Matic Spec being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Charles Broom winning 2 and Matic Spec winning 2.
- The last match between Charles Broom and Matic Spec was at the M15 Fayetteville, 03-11-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Charles Broom getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charles Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 330.18 while Matic Spec has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charles Broom has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matic Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charles Broom has converted 34.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matic Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Charles Broom vs Matic Spec Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Broom vs M. Spec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 18 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:14:0 | Average Match Time | 1:14:0 |
| 51% (48/95) | 1st Serve % | 59% (58/99) |
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (35/58) |
| 47% (22/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (24/41) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (6/10) |
| 40% (40/99) | Return Points Win % | 42% (40/95) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Broom 53%, Spec 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Broom 56%, Spec 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Broom 62%, Spec 0%.
C. Broom Recent Matches Played
M. Spec Recent Matches Played

C. Broom vs M. Spec Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.90% (260/160) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.74% (167/95) |
| 59.45% (585/399) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.12% (364/222) |
| 53.96% (5015/4279) | Games Win/Loss | 55.49% (3011/2415) |
| 65.99% (130/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.44% (94/59) |
| 66.67% (44/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.56% (59/31) |
| 55.45% (61/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73.68% (14/5) |
| 53.19% (25/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1766 | Aces Total | 440 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1039 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
| 1:28:6 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 384.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.44 |
| 62% (15176/24429) | 1st Serve % | 58% (5307/9198) |
| 70% (10626/15176) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3634/5307) |
| 50% (4664/9252) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1944/3893) |
| 41% (1103/2676) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (440/1041) |
| 41% (10640/25959) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3922/9317) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.35% (51/64) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 69.93% (207/89) | Futures W/L | 64.09% (166/93) |
| 62% (258/417) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (163/258) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (71/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (31/55) |
| 54% (77/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (30/64) |
| 87% (248/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (162/147) |
| 13% (248/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (162/15) |
| 26% (172/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (100/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:10 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.31
W2
1.53
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
02:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
6.55
03:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.2
W2
1.29
01:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.666
W2
2.05
12:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.57
W2
2.48
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal